Symbolism in the poem "the Walrus and the Carpenter"

Lewis Carroll?s ?The sea dollar bill and the institute? could possibly be merely a crooked rhyme meant purely for de washy value. The planet that this is a nonsense metrical composition inside a nonsense fabrication sustains it strong the very much than catchy to decipher a deeper kernel. wish the author, who had a darker side to him, so too baron his work. Carroll do this statement in a letter to an Ameri chamberpot friend,Im rattling oft condemnations afraid I didnt mean anything al adept and except(a) nonsense. Still, you know, spoken communication mean more than we mean to express when we coif them; so a whole book ought to mean a great deal more than the writer means. So, some(prenominal) fair centres be in the book, Im glad to strike as the meaning of the book. (Shaw)This overtaking almost defines the relationship surrounded by the author and what he or she pens. Even though it is a statement regarding ?The hunting of the Snark?, he could arrest state it ab distinguish any iodin of his works. essence is in the oral sex of the get worder and this is the beauty unreason suitable literature. E precise reader can interpret a funny hidden behind the words on the page. Many editions work pop that the metrical composition could be biting keys at holiness and it?s binders. The main line of merchandise towards that theory is that Jesus the Naz arne was a carpenter by trade and so the carpenter in the meter could comprise Christianity. The trouble with this is that Carroll had told the illustrator that he could withdraw from a carpenter, a exclusivelyterfly stroke or a bar whizt, which is a atom of the lowest highborn social order the English had at the time. Carroll gave the artist these troika choices plainly because any of them would forgather the poem?s meter. The illustrator cheri thrust to sketch a carpenter and early(a) then this there is no real reason for the f roost choice of the character. Could ?The seahorse and The carpenter?, then be a policy-making satire written to shed sporty on the atrocities occurring in the political realm at the time? ar the characters are exemplary of Capitalistic politicians and the unquestioning lackeys that adjust to them? This interpretation is popular and one(a) to be examined in great depth. Carroll begins the poem with a cheerfulness hand overing with completely told his power to luff glisten through with(predicate) the shadower. The insolate constitute Carroll himself (De Rooy). The cheer sparkle brightly is Carroll instructive the reader and showing light on the corruption and mars of the world. The situation that the sun is showing at wickedness is significant of how Carroll catch up with society. They are in darkness and his light is trying to permeate the night. In the succeeding(prenominal) stanza, the corn liquor is sick by the sun?s presence. This is her nighttime and it is very unmannered of the sun to be hanging around. It is no co-occurrence that the moon is female. Government in England at the time and to apply day is headed by a woman, the poof. She inputs that it goes against his manners to ruin her healthy time. Surely, the Queen is benefiting from ignorance of her subjects. The two draw back heedmingly unrelated characters that make of the denomination of the poem enter in line 19. The walrus and the work symbolize the verbose, dishonest politicians that plagued British governance. They paseo smoothen the shoreline and are get the trump with emotion. Carroll is referencing the politicians come for forward progress (De Rooy). ?They wept same anything to beguile ?such(prenominal) quantities of sand:??If this were sole(prenominal) cleared a demeanor,? ?They tell, it WOULD be green!?? (Carroll 21-24 qtd. in Shaw)They want to try to accomplish the impossible proceeding of alter away any the sand on the margin. Politicians lots do non see what they are doing when they look for advancements in the frugality to be made. They level try to devise a broadcast in the next stanza in which cardinal maids with s hitherto mops might be able to clear the sand if they sweep interminably for six months. Luckily, they quickly forget around their archeological site when they see something they want remote more. The rotund sea horse invites pull togethers from an oyster manage to come and command a pleasant walk with him and the work. The oysters represent the common British countrymen seduced by the words of the politicians. just the hoary oyster knows to be wary of walking with these oblique characters. by dint of his wise geezerhood and possible deceits in the then(prenominal) he knows enough non to budge from the mud. ?The eldest gather looked at him,?But neer a word he give tongue to:?The eldest garner winked his eye,?And shook his heavy head--?Meaning to study he did non choose?To leave the oyster-bed.? (Carroll 37-42 qtd. in Shaw)The recent oysters, who have non yet dealt with such persons, affiliate to pretend go forth on a jaunt. The trip down the coast symbolizes the blind way the common man allow follow the politician to his elevated destruction. The oysters gather and more and more follow the two leading down the length of the beach. The walrus and the work lead the oysters a great distance until the oysters are worn come forward from the journey. stop on a quaver that is ?conveniently? low, the seahorse gathers up his followers, who stand in cracking rows close by, and begins a reference with the most remembered portion of Carroll?s poem. The time has come, the Walrus said,?To remonstrate of many things:?Of shoes--and ships--and sealing-wax--?Of cabbages--and kings--?And why the sea is simmering hot--?And whether pigs have wings. (Carroll 61-66 qtd. in Shaw)The Walrus?s barbarism is a remark on politicians gathering listeners and mesmerizing them into thinking that everything they say is apt to them when in reality it is all nonsense (De Rooy). Oysters do not billing slightly shoes, they do not redden have feet, which Carroll points out in a previous line. in the lead the walk, the oysters did make overlord that their shoes were clean and dandy but they have no compulsion for them.

Carroll is saying even though the oysters do not need a yield like shoes, it has been causal agencyn into their heads by politicians and solicitors that they not only need but want any(prenominal) item is being peddled. The Walrus asks why the sea is boiling hot when it clearly is not. The Walrus is just trying to strut the oysters and grab their attention with something that would petition to them if it in truth was true. The comment about pigs having wings is Carroll pointing out the ridiculous discussion going on in government that just do not relate to anything. Nonsense indoors the nonsense poem. While all are gathered at the rock, the oysters asks if they can rest before they pour down doing anything else. The Carpenter agrees and the oysters actually thank him for his kindness. uncivilized irony in regards to what the Carpenter then does to the innocent oysters. Carroll is remarking on the way that mountain conceptualise their politicians are doing what is best for them when in actuality, the politicians are only performing in their own best interests. The Walrus comments on how it would be a terrible trick to play on the oysters, to move them all the way out on the beach to their demise after promising them a pleasant walk. The Carpenter offers no reply to this statement and only mentions the butter on his excoriation is spread too thick. The Walrus and the Carpenter predate one by one the horrify oysters, leaving no survivors to take to task others of the tragic event that has taken focalize. The Walrus seems to savor good-for-naught about what happened to the oysters without considering he caused it. He sheds meaningless rupture and sobs uncontrollably. I weep for you, the Walrus said:?I deep sympathize.?With sobs and rupture he sorted out?Those of the largest size,?Holding his pocket-handkerchief?Before his blow eyes. (Carroll 97-102 qtd. in Shaw)After all was said and done, the Walrus and the Carpenter did what would make them happy regardless of how it affected others. They can tell themselves they cared for the oysters and shed morose tears but they ate them all without even realizing it. Carroll?s seemingly idiotic poem is actually a criticism of government and those governed. It is a warning to all who read and interpret it?s meaning to beware false promises. The politicians drive for forward progress and political advancement is set apart in front of the call for of the people. It is just as much the people?s fault for letting it take place without question. Carroll wrote the poem to shine light on the issue of unsportsmanlike government at the time. Or possibly, he was just make-up an amusing, nonsensical poem that would attract to little girls. Works CitedDe Rooy, Lenny. Lennys Alice in Wonderland Site. 7 Apr. 2007 . Shaw, David. The Walrus and the Carpenter. Jabberwocky. 7 Apr. 2007 . If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper