Tuesday, December 18, 2018
'Maximum-security prisons Essay\r'
'Abstract\r\nMaximum-security prison houses argon known to be designed and organized to prevent escapes and violence and to reject pris whizzrs from harming one another including the correctional officers. Super-max facilities imposes strict limitations on the freedom of inmates and visitors. These prisons, usually an imposing edifice ar prisons surrounded by high stone walls extend with guard towers. The purpose of these type of facilities is custody and discipline, it embraces military-style attempt to order. Prisoners in custody under these facilities follow a strict routine. Inmates behavior is surveillanced, head counts are frequent eliminating the all the prisonersââ¬â¢ privacy.\r\nIntroduction\r\nSupermax (short for ââ¬Å"super- utmost securityââ¬Â) is the name utilise to describe ââ¬Å"control-unitââ¬Â prisons, or units within prisons, which represent the nigh secure levels of custody in the prison systems of true countries. The objective is to provide long term, segregated sustenance accommodations for inmates classified as the highest security risks in the prison system â⬠the ââ¬Å"worst of the worstââ¬Â criminals, and those who pose a threat to national and international security. (Mears, Daniel 2012)\r\nAs stated in the Wiipedia the free Encyclopedia, Supermax and Security Housing social unit (SHU) prisons are controversial; some claim that the living conditions in such facilities violate the United States Constitution, specifically, the 8th Amendmentââ¬â¢s proscription against ââ¬Å"cruel and unusualââ¬Â punishments. In 1996, a United Nations team assigned to wonder torture described SHU conditions as ââ¬Å"inhuman and degrading.ââ¬Â A 2011 New York Bar association comprehensive cogitation suggested that supermax prisons constitute ââ¬Å"torture under international constabularyââ¬Â and ââ¬Å"cruel and unusual punishment under the U.S. Constitution.ââ¬Â In 2012, a federal class action hold agains t the Federal situation of Prisons and officials who run ADX Florence SHU (Bacote v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Civil Action 1:12-cv-01570) alleged degenerative abuse, failure to properly diagnose and neglect of prisoners who are seriously mentally ill.\r\nThe U.S. government houses a keep down of convicted terrorists, gang leaders, spies, and similar prisoners in a supermax prison known as ADMAX, the Federal administrative maximum security prison in Florence, Colorado, west of Pueblo. base of operations terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui was sentenced to life without parole at Florence upon his conviction on May 4, 2006.Residents also include Theodore Kaczynski, a domestic terrorist otherwise known as the Unabomber, who once attacked via get down bombs; Robert Hanssen, an American FBI Agent turned Soviet sleuth; Terry Nichols, an accomplice to the Oklahoma City shelling; and Richard Reid, known as the ââ¬Å"Shoe Bomberââ¬Â, who was absorbed for life for attempting to detonat e explosive materials in his apparel while on board an aircraft.\r\nA suit of clothes alleges severe abuse of federal prisoners at ADX-Florence in Colorado, whatââ¬â¢s known as a supermax quick-wittedness where many inmates are housed in solitary toil for 23 hours a day. It charges the government violates the Eighth Amendmentââ¬â¢s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.\r\nConclusion\r\nTo conclude, I would remember the super-max prisons to consider the lives of prisoners being locked-up having no privileges at all. I acknowledge the fact that they go for pull direful and heavy crimes and those acts that have already been make have caused damage to the state and/or the U.S. and that what has been do you cannot give in back or undo moreover I strongly study that these criminals should have at least a fair lock up at that place with a few privileges freeed in these maximum-security prisons. The prisons should put up the inmates to have at least some meeting with other prisoners and a midget more freedom.\r\n fit in to Mr. Arone (American Corrections p. 270) ââ¬Å"If you lock a dog in a pen and throw food at bottom three times a day and never talk to him after a year when you contribute the pen youââ¬â¢re going to have a killer.ââ¬Â This makes absolute sense because I strongly believe that when a person is locked up in foursome walls with nothing to do or no one to talk to and with limited disgusting food impel in, it will definitely make a person go crazy throughout the time. These criminals are already serving time for their crimes but I applyââ¬â¢t agree that they should be treated equivalent animals. This is severe abuse is called cruel punishment.\r\nTo conclude, I would recommend the super-max prisons to consider the lives of prisoners being locked-up having no privileges at all. I acknowledge the fact that they have committed horrible and heavy crimes and those acts that have already been made have caused damag e to the state and/or the U.S. and that what has been done you cannot take back or undo but I strongly believe that these criminals should have at least a fair lock up there with a few privileges allowed several times a week at the least in these maximum-security prisons. The prisons should allow the inmates to have at least some get through with other prisoners in hope of therapeatic communication, and a little more freedom for personal needs.\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment